And people wonder why I don’t trust doctors.
How’s that again?
According to MSNBC, Philip Seaton, 61, and his wife are seeking unspecified damages for “loss of love, service and affection” after his penis was removed during a “routine circumcision.”
There has got to be more to this story than meets the eye.
Why is a 61 year-old man having a circumcision? How could you be given general anesthesia without your consent? Why would you let anyone with a scalpel come near your Johnson?
An attorney for the rogue weenie whackers says that his clients had no choice but to lop off the plaintiff’s pee pee when they discovered it was cancerous. He’s confident Seaton’s charge will not stand up in court.
I’ve said it a million times kids: there’s no such thing as a routine circumcision.